Low pay

Fewer hours at work? Choking on your breakfast? Spluttering into your coffee? Nice if you can afford it! For many the shorter working week is just a pipe dream. Many people need every available hour of work, just to get by.

Yes. To make the shorter working week possible for everyone, some other pretty major policies would have to change. The minimum wage would have to become a living wage, and a living wage while working fewer hours. And we would finally, finally have to tackle the fact that a decent home is unaffordable for many people. This is no small endeavour.

However, moving towards a shorter working week could actually help us move towards a more equal society, with more people in jobs that provide a decent living. We can’t wait until fair wages and affordable housing have become a reality: changing the way that we share out work is part of the solution.

Firstly, we could be sharing the available work. At the moment, while many have so much work it leaves little time or energy for the rest of their lives, a significant number – especially of young people – have no work at all. Surely it would make more sense to share around the work available at any one time, than leave a minority of people without any possibility to earn their own income. Economist Juliet Schor (cited in NEF’s 2012 briefing About Time – Developing the case for a shorter working week) has said, “The UK has entered a period of high and chronic unemployment and underemployment…work time reduction becomes the key to restoring balance in the labour market.” Moreover, people on higher incomes are tending to work longer and longer hours, while others have less work than they need or none at all. Schor continues, “This is a kind of structural unemployment that occurs when working hours are too high. Redistribution of hours is therefore central to a programme leading to more egalitarian distribution outcomes.”

Secondly, people who want shorter hours for reasons such as their health or their caring responsibilities are in a bottleneck of low paid part time work with no progression opportunities. In London, for example, the London Assembly has called on the Mayor to create 20.000 specifically part time jobs across the income spectrum. There isn’t a shortage of part time jobs – there is a shortage of decently paid part time jobs. According to Building a Sustainable Quality Recruitment Market, a 2012 report from Women Like Us/Timewise Foundation, in London there is only one part time vacancy advertised that earns the full time equivalent of £20,000 or more for every 18 similarly paid full time vacancies. In contrast, there are seven lower paid part time vacancies for each of those paid above £20,000. Part time opportunities for all those who want them, across the income scale, would actually increase rather than decreasing equity.

Thirdly, there is nothing sacred about a five day working week, and earlier reductions in working hours were down to the efforts of the unions and their working members. In the 19th century, it was thought that society could only possibly work with a six day working week, and much longer working days. Edward and Robert Skidelsky put this as follows. “The reduction of the working week was one of the great achievements of 20th-century social democracy. A labourer in mid-Victorian Britain could expect to work 60 hours a week – 10 hours a day, six days a week – from adolescence till death. Sundays alone were left free for chapel or gin. The early trade union movement campaigned vigorously against this regime with the slogan “Eight hours labour, eight hours recreation, eight hours rest”. Its efforts bore fruit. By 1930, weekly hours in Britain had sunk to 47; by 1980, they were down to 40.”

Fourthly, sometimes the idea of more time to pursue one’s own passions is written off as ‘middle class’. The ability to afford to do this may indeed be the privilege of the better-off in our highly unequal society, but the idea that only a privileged portion of society has passions they want to pursue is laughable. It’s a recent thing for it to be regarded as middle class. Just look at the historical roots of football, or growing food on allotments, or brass bands or male voice choirs. And if you have a low income the need to rely on and give to the community is pressing.

Finally, an idea needs to be on the public agenda before it can become reality. It needs to be discussed and debated. Distant as their realisation may seem, the ideas of a living wage and affordable homes for all are at least on the public agenda. In this sense, the idea of a shorter working week is behind these other areas of policy, and needs to catch up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s